000 | 01892nab a2200181 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230910122355.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230910b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aDoucette, Jamie _957645 |
||
245 |
_aAnxieties of an emerging donor: _bThe Korean development experience and the politics of international development cooperation/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 38, Issue 4, 2020 (656–673 p.) | ||
520 | _aThis article examines recent knowledge sharing initiatives aimed at promoting South Korea’s development experience as a ‘development alternative’ and questions the coherence of the narratives being shared. Drawing upon an idea first put forward by Anna Tsing, I discuss how South Korea’s development cooperation initiatives occupy a zone of awkward engagement in which multiple meanings of its experience have proliferated and explore the anxieties that this engagement creates for practitioners. In particular, the article finds that practitioner anxiety is informed by a triple set of pressures for Korea to export an alternative development model, extend the overseas activities of domestic businesses, and entertain the ambitions of ruling political blocs. By focusing on questions of anxious engagement and the seemingly strategic ambiguity of knowledge sharing efforts it produces, the article highlights some of the limits and possibilities that shape the promotion of the Korean developmental state as an alternative development model for South–South cooperation and extends the emotional register of literature on emerging donors by questioning discursive claims that privilege empathy and reciprocity as drivers of development cooperation. | ||
773 | 0 |
_08872 _917105 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning C: _x1472-3425 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420904082 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c14537 _d14537 |