000 01581nab a2200193 4500
003 OSt
005 20221029111245.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 221027b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aNicholas A Phelps
_954155
245 _aVarieties of urban entrepreneurialism/
260 _bsage,
_c2020.
300 _aVol 10, issue 3, 2020 : (304–321 p.).
520 _aWe revisit the concept of urban entrepreneurialism to highlight some of its variety. In particular, the present article refocuses discussion on: processes of innovation, bringing geography into dialogue with the literature on innovation in public services; normative questions surrounding the ends to which urban entrepreneurship is turned; and the need for analysis to go beyond the territorial traps of the nation and the city to consider how urban entrepreneurialism articulates with the national state and is projected internationally. We distinguish urban managerialism from the new urban managerialism, urban diplomacy, urban intrapreneurialism and urban speculation, drawing on international examples to highlight the mixed qualities and effects of these varieties of urban entrepreneurialism. In conclusion, we note the limitations of our framework and its relationship to the related ideas of neoliberalization, financialization and accumulation by dispossession.
700 _aJulie T Miao
_954156
773 0 _010527
_916533
_dSage Publications Ltd., 2019
_tDialogues in human geography.
_w(OSt)20840795
_x2043-8214
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619890438
942 _2ddc
_cART
999 _c13404
_d13404