000 | 01581nab a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20221029111245.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 221027b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aNicholas A Phelps _954155 |
||
245 | _aVarieties of urban entrepreneurialism/ | ||
260 |
_bsage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 10, issue 3, 2020 : (304–321 p.). | ||
520 | _aWe revisit the concept of urban entrepreneurialism to highlight some of its variety. In particular, the present article refocuses discussion on: processes of innovation, bringing geography into dialogue with the literature on innovation in public services; normative questions surrounding the ends to which urban entrepreneurship is turned; and the need for analysis to go beyond the territorial traps of the nation and the city to consider how urban entrepreneurialism articulates with the national state and is projected internationally. We distinguish urban managerialism from the new urban managerialism, urban diplomacy, urban intrapreneurialism and urban speculation, drawing on international examples to highlight the mixed qualities and effects of these varieties of urban entrepreneurialism. In conclusion, we note the limitations of our framework and its relationship to the related ideas of neoliberalization, financialization and accumulation by dispossession. | ||
700 |
_aJulie T Miao _954156 |
||
773 | 0 |
_010527 _916533 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619890438 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |
||
999 |
_c13404 _d13404 |