000 02365nab a2200277 4500
999 _c11720
_d11720
003 OSt
005 20210611162429.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210611b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aBond, Sophie
_943930
245 _aContesting deep sea oil: Politicisation–depoliticisation–repoliticisation
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 37, Issue 3, 2019 (519-538 p.)
520 _aBetween 2010 and 2017, the New Zealand Government undertook a range of subtle yet disturbing tactics to create a legislative environment that enabled deep sea oil exploration. This included forms of public endorsement, policy documents and legislative change that prioritised further oil development in the country to create a certain common-sense around increased fossil fuel extraction. In response, a range of communities and autonomous Oil Free groups have emerged to contest both the legislative changes and this underlying common-sense. We draw on this example to respond to calls within geography and political science literature to situate analysis of contemporary politics in empirical contexts. We use Rancière’s thought combined with the frames of politicisation, depoliticisation and repoliticisation to explore the entangled nature of government and oil industry actions, and community climate change activism. We argue that while there were clearly attempts by government and the oil industry to close down spaces of dissent and limit debate around fossil fuel development to technocratic questions of health and safety, the effects of attempts at closure are paradoxical. Such attempts at closure are always incomplete and at times, mobilise people to contestatory action. We show how activists have strategically drawn on certain discourses to exert claims of, and for, equality in public debates around the pressing issue of climate change.
650 _aPost-politics,
_930217
650 _aradical democracy,
_934522
650 _a oil,
_941931
650 _aenvironmental activism,
_946287
650 _aAotearoa New Zealand,
_946288
650 _aclimate justice
_946289
700 _aDiprose, Gradon
_946290
700 _aThomas, Amanda C
_946291
773 0 _08872
_915873
_dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010
_tEnvironment and planning C:
_x1472-3425
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418788675
942 _2ddc
_cART