000 01747nab a2200253 4500
999 _c11712
_d11712
003 OSt
005 20210611125433.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210611b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aAlonso, Jose M
_930741
245 _aFiscal decentralisation and local government efficiency: Does relative deprivation matter?
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 37, Issue 2, 2019 (360-381 p.)
520 _aFiscal decentralisation arguably improves government efficiency because it enhances responsiveness to local policy issues and incentivises fiscal discipline. However, critics suggest that central control over local spending is necessary to equalise fiscal outcomes between prosperous and deprived areas. Using a two-stage analysis, we investigate the validity of these arguments by analysing the separate and combined effects of fiscal decentralisation and socio-economic deprivation on the productive efficiency of English local governments during 2002–2008. The results suggest that decentralisation is positively related to productive efficiency and that there is a negative relationship between socio-economic deprivation and efficiency. Further analysis reveals that deprivation weakens the positive decentralisation–efficiency relationship, calling into question simplistic proposals for fiscal decentralisation.
650 _aFiscal centralisation,
_934280
650 _a deprivation,
_942570
650 _aefficiency,
_946252
650 _alocal government,
_946253
650 _a England
_946254
700 _a Andrews, Rhys
_946255
773 0 _08872
_915873
_dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010
_tEnvironment and planning C:
_x1472-3425
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418784947
942 _2ddc
_cART