000 02307nab a2200241 4500
999 _c11620
_d11620
003 OSt
005 20210412125018.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 210412b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aKang, Chang-Deok
_945746
245 _aEffects of spatial access to neighborhood land-use density on housing prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Seoul, South Korea
260 _bSage,
_c2019.
300 _aVol 46, Issue 4, 2019,(603-625 p.)
520 _aAttaining a mixture and diversity of land use within walkable neighborhoods is an essential principle within contemporary urban planning and design. Empirical studies by New Urbanists argue that mixed land use, neo-traditional, and walkable neighborhoods yield socioeconomic benefits and generate a substantial premium in residential property prices. However, few studies apply reliable metrics to capture the connections among urban form, the spatial distribution of land use, and travel behavior and then value their combined effects on housing prices. To bridge this gap, this study calculates the metrics of spatial accessibility and centrality, combining street nodes, networks, and built density by land use type within walkable neighborhoods. We investigate empirically the extent to which residents value spatial accessibility and centrality to residential, commercial, office, and industrial space regarding housing prices in Seoul, South Korea in 2010. The multilevel hedonic price models used suggest that residents highly value urban settings that access larger volumes of commercial and residential buildings in densely spaced areas along dense street networks. However, homeowners respond negatively to higher access to industrial property and weakly to office space. This analysis identifies the value of spatial access to heterogeneous land-use density in housing prices and provides policy implications for land use, transportation, and urban design.
650 _2Accessibility,
650 _a centrality,
_945274
650 _a land-use density,
_945747
650 _a housing prices,
_945748
650 _aSeoul
_945749
773 0 _011590
_915512
_dSage 2019.
_t Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317721184
942 _2ddc
_cART