000			02146nam a2200277 4500
999			_c11513 _d11513
003			OSt
005			20210310145308.0
008			210310b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMosciaro, Mayra _945135
245			_aReinforcing uneven development: The financialisation of Brazilian urban redevelopment projects
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 56, Issue 10, 2019,(2160-2178 p.)
520			_aThe entrepreneurial city discourse has been adopted around the globe by policymakers, with the urban redevelopment project as one of its most representative symbols. The predominantly favourable discourse revolving around this new political economy of urban space is supported by claims that newly regenerated areas bring multiple benefits to the city and its citizens. These narratives have been used in Brazil to justify increasing reliance on an urban planning tool known as Urban Operations. This planning tool, developed in the 1990s, seeks to facilitate cooperation between public and private actors in the production of new urban spaces. While projected by some as a ‘magic formula’ that enables major urban redevelopment projects without public expenditure, the outcomes of Urban Operations often differ significantly from expectations. The cases of Água Espraiada (São Paulo) and Porto Maravilha (Rio de Janeiro) are used to demonstrate that regenerated areas, as preferred spaces for the penetration of financialised practices into the built environment, have brought forward new dynamics that are serving to reinforce pre-existing social inequalities and to exacerbate uneven development in Brazil’s main cities.
650			_aBrazil, _945136
650			_abuilt environment, _939154
650			_afinance, _945137
650			_afinancialisation, _945138
650			_aredevelopment, _945139
650			_aregeneration, _945140
650			_aurban operations, _945141
650			_a urbanisation and developing countries _942757
700			_aPereira, Alvaro _932597
773	0		_011188 _915499 _dsage, 2019. _tUrban studies
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019829428
942			_2ddc _cART