000 | 01855nab a2200241 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c10967 _d10967 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20201211124917.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 201211b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aCobban, Timothy W. _934102 |
||
245 | _aBigger Is Better: Reducing the Cost of Local Administration by Increasing Jurisdiction Size in Ontario, Canada, 1995–2010 | ||
260 |
_bSage _c2019 |
||
300 | _aVol 55, Issue 2, 2019 : (462-500 p.) | ||
520 | _aIn recent decades, the belief that larger municipalities can better capture economies of scale led to compulsory amalgamations in several countries. This article examines such a program of compulsory amalgamations in Ontario, Canada, during the late 1990s and early 2000s. By exogenously deciding on a course of municipal restructuring, and leaving a large comparison group of nonamalgamated municipalities within the same institutional framework, the Ontario reforms created a quasi-experiment on the importance of scale for local government. Using a difference-in-differences methodological approach, this article exploits the quasi-experimental setting of the Ontario reforms to examine the causal effect of jurisdiction size on the cost of local administration. The main empirical finding in this article is that increasing local jurisdiction size reduces the cost of local administration. The results provide the most convincing evidence to date that economies of scale exist in local administration and can be captured through consolidation. | ||
650 |
_amunicipal amalgamation _933287 |
||
650 |
_aCanada _931018 |
||
650 |
_alocal government consolidation _934103 |
||
650 |
_aOntario _934104 |
||
650 |
_aeconomies of scale _934105 |
||
773 | 0 |
_010947 _915473 _dSage, 2019. _tUrban affairs review |
|
856 | _u https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087417719324 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |