000			01636nab a2200193 4500
999			_c10656 _d10656
003			OSt
005			20200923162554.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			200923b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHorner, Rory _930455
245			_aGlobal Development, Converging Divergence and Development Studies: A Rejoinder
260			_bWiley, _c2019.
300			_aVol.50, Issue 2,2019:(495-510 p.)
520			_aThis rejoinder addresses key cross‐cutting issues in the contributions to this Forum Debate, most notably the contesting of the empirical basis for the converging divergence thesis, the causes that underlie the trends identified, and the implications for development studies and practice. We maintain our argument for a ‘converging divergence’ referring to a direction of change from approximately 1990–2015, which includes but goes beyond income and takes account of growing inequality within many countries. Moreover, we argue that the case for reframing international development as global development, as briefly outlined in the original article, goes beyond empirical data to underlying causal processes of globalized capitalism and global climate change. We hope that this Forum Debate significantly enriches the discussion about 21st century global development and helps weaken the intellectual appeal of the binary logic that has underpinned the concept and practice of international development.
700			_aHulme, David _930456
773	0		_08737 _915395 _dWest Sussex John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1970 _tDevelopment and change _x0012-155X
856			_u https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12496
942			_2ddc _cART