Citing the Poor: Commercial Sovereignty and Capitalist Integration in Colonial Karachi
Material type: TextPublication details: Sage, 2019.Description: Vol 45, Issue 5, 2019(987-1005 p.)Subject(s): Online resources: In: Journal of urban historySummary: Building on recent studies that have sought to locate Karachi’s history within multiple geographies, this article analyzes how Karachi’s urban poor became used to prove Karachi’s (and by extension Sindh’s) “economic backwardness.” Most significantly, the question of Sindh’s autonomy was voiced in the institution of the Karachi Municipality, where advocates began deploying Karachi’s poor, their housing conditions, and laboring conditions to contest Karachi’s material and social construction. Using Karachi’s laboring and poor in this way rendered the city’s poor marked by ethnic identity awaiting integration into world commerce rather than laborers in a growing, capitalist, and unequal city. In other words, rather than being seen as effects of capitalist development writ large with the uneven effects that colonial capitalism entailed, the city’s poor were positioned as capitalist development’s future beneficiaries.Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E-Journal | Library, SPAB | Reference Collection | v. 45(1-6) / Jan-Dec 2019 | Available |
Building on recent studies that have sought to locate Karachi’s history within multiple geographies, this article analyzes how Karachi’s urban poor became used to prove Karachi’s (and by extension Sindh’s) “economic backwardness.” Most significantly, the question of Sindh’s autonomy was voiced in the institution of the Karachi Municipality, where advocates began deploying Karachi’s poor, their housing conditions, and laboring conditions to contest Karachi’s material and social construction. Using Karachi’s laboring and poor in this way rendered the city’s poor marked by ethnic identity awaiting integration into world commerce rather than laborers in a growing, capitalist, and unequal city. In other words, rather than being seen as effects of capitalist development writ large with the uneven effects that colonial capitalism entailed, the city’s poor were positioned as capitalist development’s future beneficiaries.
There are no comments on this title.