Why there and then, not here and now? Ecological offsetting in California and England, and the sharpening contradictions of neoliberal natures/ (Record no. 12486)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02654nab a2200253 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20220802153902.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220722b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Lockhart, Andy
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Why there and then, not here and now? Ecological offsetting in California and England, and the sharpening contradictions of neoliberal natures/
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Sage,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages Vol 2, issue 3, 2019 : (665-693 p.).
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Failure has become an increasingly important theme of debate in the literature on neoliberal natures. In this article we take up this topic with respect to ecological offsetting, often regarded as an exemplar of market-oriented conservation. Comparing the case of species banking which emerged in California in the 1990s with frustrated efforts to implement a biodiversity offsetting programme in England beginning in 2010, we develop a novel analytical framework for explaining why this kind of environmental market-making may or may not be successful in different contexts. Drawing on work in geography on the neoliberalisation of nature and insights from economic sociology, we characterise ecological offsetting as ‘command-and-commodify’ regulation: a peculiar form of hybrid ecological regulation which depends on an institutional mix of ‘authoritative’ and ‘economic’ power to function. In California, these kinds of environmental markets initially emerged at a moment of compromise, contingent on an embrace of ‘market’ solutions to environmental problems on the one hand, and a somewhat paradoxical expansion of authoritative power to ecologically regulate land development, on the other. In England, by contrast, deep fiscal austerity and deregulatory zeal, combined with resistance from nearly every quarter, initially undermined the possibility of balancing economic and authoritative power, which we argue is necessary for the construction of viable ecological offsetting. Reflecting on themes in the wider literature, we conclude by questioning whether the English experience is indicative of sharpening tensions between economy and ecology in the late neoliberal era.
650 ## - Subject
Subject Neoliberal natures,
650 ## - Subject
Subject ecological offsetting,
650 ## - Subject
Subject environmental markets,
650 ## - Subject
Subject command-and-commodify regulation,
650 ## - Subject
Subject England, California
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
Added Entry Personal Name Rea, Chris
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Host Biblionumber 12446
Host Itemnumber 16479
Place, publisher, and date of publication London: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019.
Title Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space/
International Standard Serial Number 25148486
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619850778
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Articles
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
-- 49622
650 ## - Subject
-- 49623
650 ## - Subject
-- 49624
650 ## - Subject
-- 49625
650 ## - Subject
-- 49626
650 ## - Subject
-- 49627
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
-- 49628
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
-- ddc

No items available.

Library, SPA Bhopal, Neelbad Road, Bhauri, Bhopal By-pass, Bhopal - 462 030 (India)
Ph No.: +91 - 755 - 2526805 | E-mail: [email protected]

OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.
Free counter